Special Operations Command should therefore calculate the associated force size requirements using sustainable ratios of deployed time to time at home for the entities conducting these enduring missions. Barring any major unforeseen positive changes in the governance and security sectors of the developing world, these requirements should be seen as indefinite. This implies the maintenance of a certain number of counter-terrorism strike forces and associated intelligence, analysis, and communications architectures commensurate capabilities in media/information operations, cyber, and threat finance and a network of liaison entities and officers in key U.S. They will also have to maintain the ability to monitor and neutralize new groups before they develop a capability to do so.
What does this mean for special operations forces? It means that whatever their inclinations for missions may be, they will have to maintain a set of task forces that can disrupt the most capable terrorist groups from striking the American homeland. Joe Dunford recently said - managing “ the symptoms of violent extremism” for the foreseeable future.
Spec ops global drivers#
budget into addressing the underlying drivers of terrorism abroad, the Defense Department will be stuck - as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Until or unless Congress decides to put sizeable amounts of the U.S. Which is to say, these are issues without a military solution but for which the United States has largely chosen to apply military means. I would submit that he is both right and that his thought extends to the counter-terrorism mission globally. Some were disappointed with this comment. Stanley McChrystal was cited as saying the best the United States could hope for in Afghanistan was to keep a reasonably sized force there and “to muddle along” as best as possible. As Special Operations Command undertakes this review, I offer four thoughts for its consideration, some of which build on previous suggestions in this outlet by Chad Pillai.įirst, despite being deprioritized by Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, counter-terrorism will continue to be a necessary and vital mission for the Defense Department in the coming decades. It should also enable special operations leaders to advocate for other Defense Department capabilities to support the long-term health of special operations forces. It should provide the special operations community with a chance to review and balance its portfolio of forces for the counter-terrorism mission and other missions aligned to great power competition. With the publication of the National Defense Strategy and its emphasis on competition with the likes of China and Russia, this roles and missions review comes at a critically important time. special operations forces, one of which entails examination of the roles and missions of Special Operations Command and its component forces. In the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, Congress mandated several reviews of U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
